Displaying articles with tag

Road Rage with Handguns

Posted by hank, Mon Aug 18 04:42:00 UTC 2008

One of the things I’m always hearing is how if you are allowed to have a gun in your car, road rage will involve a lot more shootings. I’ve never really believed it, and I decided to see how much the Google News Archives show for this type of story. There are around 40,000 stories that contain “road rage gun,” some of which can be seen here. I saw some interesting trends:

  • There are three incidents on the linked page in Australia, surprisingly, even though they have very strict handgun control. Even fake guns were involved…
  • There was one in Toronto, also strict on handgun ownership
  • Many states in the US are represented, including Maryland, Georgia, and Florida
  • Quite a few are road rage incidents involving off-duty or retired police officers or Federal marshalls!!

There was a study that showed that “people who carry guns in their car are more likely to have road rage.” It’s a pretty far stretch since the percentages are 23% of people with guns vs. 16% of people without them. I don’t think this is a good conclusion. Until someone can show me that road rage deaths in Texas or Alaska or Florida increased when carry laws were loosened, I won’t believe these urban legends I keep hearing. And, if they’re not urban legends, please please cite your source - at least the publication.

I find the last one really shocking. Many of these people are trained very well in firearm use and safety. I would really like to be able to break it down by state using the Google archive search, but I can’t find that. If anyone knows where I can find statistics on police reports per state for road rage incidents involving handguns, especially time series data, let me know.

Tags:

That the people have a right to keep and bear arms

Posted by hank, Wed Mar 19 02:28:00 UTC 2008

So, there I was, wondering what the Founding Fathers of these united States were thinking when they scrawled the 2nd amendment into the paper, wording it so ambiguously (at least in today’s grammar). Maybe they wrote it down in another form somewhere else… Maybe at the Virginia Convention of June 27, 1788! Keep in mind that these were simply proposed amendments, so one could feasibly argue that they later decided that people shouldn’t have guns, but they should word it in Latin Grammar so it’s really confusing…

From page 221 of my Anti-Federalist Papers:

17th. That the people have a right to keep and bear arms; that a well-regulated militia, composed of the body of the people trained to arms, is the proper, natural and safe defence of a free state; that standing armies, in time of peace, are dangerous to liberty, and ought to be avoided, as far as the circumstances and protection of the community will admit. And that, in all cases, the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power.

This is from the guys who fought for the Bill of Rights. If it wasn’t for these guys, we wouldn’t have many of the other freedoms we enjoy, like the following:

15th. Right to peaceable assembly, redress of grievances

16th. Freedom of speech, freedom of the press

20th. Freedom of religion

Tags:

Hanky's got a gun

Posted by hank, Sun Oct 14 21:39:00 UTC 2007

I need to go to the handgun store.


View Larger Map

The handgun store is open at the following times:

  • Mon - Friday 9AM - 9PM
  • Sat 9AM - 6PM
  • Sun 9AM - 4PM

Tags: